Monika Vámošová
University of Economics in Bratislava,  Bratislava, Slovakia

4th International Conference – ERAZ 2018 – KNOWLEDGE BASED SUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, Sofia- Bulgaria, June 7, 2018, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS published by: Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans, Belgrade, Serbia;  Faculty of Business Studies, Mediterranean University – Podgorica, Montenegro; University of National and World Economy – Sofia, Bulgaria; Faculty of Commercial and Business Studies – Celje, Slovenia; Faculty of Applied Management, Economics and Finance – Belgrade, Serbia, ISBN 978-86-80194-12-7


Changing society (population aging, deepening regional disparities, globalization and increasing competition) influence public service requirements. Not only inhabitants but also organisations and other market participants require more services with higher quality, cheaper, more available and more modern.
There is a fragmented structure of public administration in many European countries, including Slovakia. Level of local government is made by municipalities (villages and cities) with different size. In the smallest municipalities there live only to 10 inhabitants, in the third highest municipality Prešov there are about 90 000 inhabitants, while all Slovak municipalities (except for capital Bratislava and second highest city Košice) has equal position, status and competences. It leads to problems of small municipalities that do not have enough money to provide all services in required quality. Some authors recommend them to cooperate or connect to bigger municipalities because of saving money.
The aim of this paper is to find out if there exist economies of scale in providing of public services by local municipalities. We tested it on many provided services represented by individual expenditure groups (by COFOG classification) and on total spending of 138 Slovak municipalities with city status. We used regression method and we found out that economies of scale exist, but only in some expenditure groups. It does not occur in others. The rule of economies of scale is partially valid.  

Key words

economies of scale, expenditure, municipality


  1. Boyne, G. (1995) Population Size and Economies of Scale in Local GovernmentIn Policy and politics, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 213-222.
  2. Dollery, B., Fleming, E. (2006) A Conceptual Note on Scale Economies, Size Economies and Scope Economies in Australian Local Government. In Urban policy and Research, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 271-282.
  3. Bönish, P. et al. (2011) Municipality Size and Efficiency of local Public Services: Does Size Mattter?: discussion paper, Halle Institute for economic Research, pp. 39.
  4. Bradley, S., Taylor, J. (1998) The effect of school size on exam performance in secondary schools. In Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 291-324.
  5. Monten, A., Thater, C. (2010) Determinants of efficiency in child care provision. In FinanzArchiv, vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 378-403.
  6. Mikusova Merickova, B., Nemec, J., Soukupova, J. (2014) The Economics of Waste Management: Evidence from the Czech Republic and Slovakia. In Lex Localis, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 431-449.
  7. Byrnes, J., Dollery, B. (2002) Do Economies of Scale Exist in Australian Local Government? A Review of the Research Evidence. In Urban Policy and Research, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 391-414.
  8. Katsuyama, B. (2003) Is Municipal Consolidation the Answer? Municipal Research and Service Center of Washington.
  9. Soukupova et al. (2014) Municipality Size and Local Public Services: Do Ecoomies of Scale Exist? In The NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, vol. VII, no. 2, pp. 151-171.
  10. Swianiewicz, P. (2003) Konsolidácia alebo fragmentácia? Veľkosť miestnych samospráv v Strednej a Východnej Európe. Bratislava: M.E.S.A 10. 78 pp.
  11. Loikkanen, H., Susiluoto, I. (2005) Cost Efficiency of Finnish Municipalities in Basic Service Provision 1994-2002: discussion paper, pp. 24.