Propositions regarding papers/proceedings

All submitted papers will be peer reviewed by the reviewers drawn from the scientific committee or external reviewers depending on the topic, title and the subject matter of the paper.

Selection of papers which will be presented at the conference day (online) will be based upon quality, originality, and relevance.​

Publication of one paper prior requires payment of one registration fee, regardless of the number of authors (is there one author or two/three co-authors).

Proceedings will be indexed with ISSN, ISBN, CIP, Cobiss.SR number and DOI numbers.​

The official language of the conference is English.

EQUALITY AND CHALLENGES IN EMPLOYMENT RELATIONSHIP BASED ON KOSOVO LEGAL RESOURCES

Bashkim Rrahmani College AAB, Pristina DOI: https://doi.org/10.31410/eraz.2018.781 4th International Conference - ERAZ 2018 - KNOWLEDGE BASED SUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, Sofia- Bulgaria, June 7, 2018, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS published...

EUROPEAN BUSINESS EXCELLENCE MODEL ON SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

Vesna MiladinovićBelgrade Business School, Belgrade, SerbiaKatarina LazovićFaculty Futura, Belgrade, SerbiaDOI: https://doi.org/10.31410/eraz.2018.910 4th International Conference - ERAZ 2018 - KNOWLEDGE BASED SUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, Sofia- Bulgaria,...

Cross-border Unfair Competition Cases in Online Environment – the EU conflict-of-laws perspective in terms of legal certainty and predictability

Iveta Rohová​Masaryk University Faculty of Law (Czech Republic)DOI: https://doi.org/10.31410/eraz.2018.908 4th International Conference - ERAZ 2018 - KNOWLEDGE BASED SUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, Sofia- Bulgaria, June 7, 2018, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS...

CONTRACT ON GIVING INFORMATION AND ADVICE (CONSULTING CONTRACT)

Mario Vojnić HajdukUniversity of Novi Sad, Faculty of Law Novi Sad, SerbiaDOI: https://doi.org/10.31410/eraz.2018.906 4th International Conference - ERAZ 2018 - KNOWLEDGE BASED SUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, Sofia- Bulgaria, June 7, 2018, CONFERENCE...

IMPROVING TEACHING USING A GAME ENGINE

Natalija Vugdelija, Nenad Kojić, Nikola MihajlovićICT College for vocational studies, Belgrade, SerbiaDOI: https://doi.org/10.31410/eraz.2018.904 4th International Conference - ERAZ 2018 - KNOWLEDGE BASED SUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, Sofia- Bulgaria, June 7,...

BLACK BOX OF INDUSTRY 4.0: NEW OPPORTUNITIES FOR ENTREPRENEURSHIP ECOSYSTEM

Erşan Ciğerim, Tuğkan Arıcı, Mehmet Şahin GökGebze Technical University, Kocaeli, TurkeyDOI: https://doi.org/10.31410/eraz.2018.903 4th International Conference - ERAZ 2018 - KNOWLEDGE BASED SUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, Sofia- Bulgaria, June 7,...

Adapting a Company’s Strategy in the Digital Transformation Era

Christian TanushevUniversity of National and World Economy, Sofia, BulgariaDOI: https://doi.org/10.31410/eraz.2018.902 4th International Conference - ERAZ 2018 - KNOWLEDGE BASED SUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, Sofia- Bulgaria, June 7, 2018, CONFERENCE...

EVALUATION OF INNOVATIVE ENTREPRENEURSHIP ECOSYSTEM: TECHNOLOGY AUDIT

Mehmet Şahin Gök, Erşan Ciğerim, Tuğkan ArıcıGebze Technical University, Kocaeli, TurkeyDOI: https://doi.org/10.31410/eraz.2018.901 4th International Conference - ERAZ 2018 - KNOWLEDGE BASED SUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, Sofia- Bulgaria, June 7,...

Information and communication technologies in Serbia: growth and uneven spatial development

Aljoša Budović, Vojislav DeđanskiUniversity of Belgrade - Faculty of Geography,  Belgrade, SerbiaDOI: https://doi.org/10.31410/eraz.2018.899 4th International Conference - ERAZ 2018 - KNOWLEDGE BASED SUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, Sofia- Bulgaria, June 7,...

Off-road Tourism: An Alternative Way for Sustainable Tourism in Çanakkale, Turkey

Figen SEVİNÇBartın University, Bartın Vocational school. (Turkey)Erol DURANÇanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Faculty of Tourism (Turkey)DOI: https://doi.org/10.31410/eraz.2018.898 4th International Conference - ERAZ 2018 - KNOWLEDGE BASED SUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC...

Guidelines

ERAZ Conference - Instructions for papers

DOWNLOAD

ERAZ Conference - Biography form

DOWNLOAD

Registration and peer review process

 

Abstracts are submitted on the website – email submissions are not accepted. Each abstract is reviewed in a double-blind peer review process. The double-blind review process ensure that both authors and reviewers remain anonymous during the peer review process. Authors do not know who conducted their reviews, reviewers do not know whose abstract/paper they are reviewing.

Peer reviewers are pre-registered on the website. At the beginning of the review period, peer reviewers are requested to confirm that they are available to review abstracts and/or full papers. Peer reviewers should be aware that the MINIMUM time required to review an abstract is 20-30 minutes.

Peer reviewers complete their review on the website, which involves both multiple-choice selects and free-form comment assessments. Peer reviewers should be prepared to provide some detail, particularly for negative evaluations. Reviewers can provide feedback for the author, and also private feedback for the editor.

Authors will be notified by email if their abstract has been accepted. There is no second review of abstracts that have been accepted “with modification”. The modification of the abstract takes place when the full paper is submitted.

Full papers are submitted for double-blind peer review after successful acceptance of a conference abstract. Peer reviewers complete their review on the website, which involves both multiple-choice selects and free-form comment assessments.

Peer reviewers provide a critical assessment of the paper, and may recommend improvements. Although the author may choose not to take this advice, it is highly recommended that the author address any issues, explaining why their research process or conclusions are correct.

Notes for Peer Reviewers

Peer reviewers should be aware that the MINIMUM time required to review a paper is at least 1 hour and significantly more time is common in order to do them justice. Peer reviewers should be prepared to provide some detail, particularly for negative evaluations.

If you are invited to review a full paper, please consider:

  1. Do you have time to do the review by the deadline?
  2. Is the article within your area of expertise?
  3. Are you sure you will complete the review by the deadline?

Peer review of full papers is NOT about correcting grammar, spelling, poorly written references. It is about reviewing the academic validity and relevance of the paper! As a reviewer, if you find yourself correcting spelling, you are probably becoming bogged down in the detail, when you are meant to be assessing the “big picture”!

Full papers are evaluated against the following criteria:

1. The title, abstract and keywords must accurately reflect the paper’s contents.
2. The research must be relevant to the conference theme/s.
3. The research methodology must be sound.
4. The paper must be well-structured and clearly written.
5. References must be relevant and accurate.

The conference scientific committee makes decisions where there is a significant discrepancy between reviewer evaluations. Authors may be asked to revise their full paper where it does not correspond to their abstract, where layout or references are formatted incorrectly, to correct grammar or improve on the paper quality.

Where the conference committee requires a revision, the paper will not be published without the revision or an approved explanation of the issue.

Any identified plagiarism will automatically disqualify a paper.