Volatility Estimation of Euribor and Equilibrium Forecasting

 

Llesh Lleshaj – University of Tirana, Faculty of Economy, Tirana, Albania

 

7th International Scientific ERAZ Conference – ERAZ 2021 – Conference Proceedings: KNOWLEDGE BASED SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT,  Online/virtual, May 27, 2021

ERAZ Conference Proceedings published by: Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans – Belgrade, Serbia

ERAZ conference partners: Faculty of Economics and Business, Mediterranean University, Montenegro; University of National and World Economy – Sofia, Bulgaria; Faculty of Commercial and Business Studies – Celje, Slovenia; AMBIS University, Prague – Czech Republic; Faculty of Applied Management, Economics and Finance – Belgrade, Serbia

ERAZ Conference 2021 Conference Proceedings: ISBN 978-86-80194-46-2, ISSN 2683-5568, DOI: https://doi.org/10.31410/ERAZ.2021

Keywords:
Euribor;
Volatility modeling;
GARCH forecasting;
EMH

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31410/ERAZ.2021.171

Abstract: Euribor rates (Euro Interbank Offered Rate) rates are considered to be the most important reference rates in the European money market. The interest rates do provide the basis for the price and interest rates of all kinds of financial products like interest rate swaps, interest rate futures, saving accounts and mortgages. Since September 2014, this index has per­formed with negative rates. In recent years, several European central banks have imposed negative interest rates on commercial banks, as the only way to stimulate their nations’ economies. Under these circumstances, the purpose of this study is to estimate the gap of the negative rates which are still increasing constantly. This fact puts in question the financial stability in many countries and the effect of monetary policy on stimulating economic growth around European countries. According to the daily data 2016 – 2021, this study has analyzed the volatility of the Euribor index related to efficient market hypothesis and volatility clustering. Applying advanced volatility econometric methods, GARCH volatility models are derived and the long-run equilibrium is predicted. Practical Implications are related to the empiri­cal impacts that ought to be taken into consideration by the banking sector and other financial institutions to make decisions with the Euribor index.

ERAZ Conference

Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission. 

ERAZ Conference Open Access

References

Alfred, W. (2019). Currency jumps, Euribor-OIS spreads and the volatility skew: A study on the dollar-euro crash risk of 2007–2015. Finance Research Letters, 29, 7-16

Blaskowitz, O., & Herwartz, H. (2009). Adaptive Forecasting of the EURIBOR Swap Term Structure. Journal of Forecasting, 28, 575–594

Brooks, C. (2014). Introductory Econometrics for Finance, 3rd Edition, Cambridge University Press

Chia, C.L., Skindilias, K., & Karathanasopoulos, A. (2016). Forecasting latent volatility through a Markov chain approximation filter. Journal of Forecasting, 35, 54-69.

Corsi, F., & Renò, R. (2012). Discrete-time volatility forecasting with persistent leverage effect and the link with continuous-time volatility modelling. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 30 (3), 368–380.

Engle, F., R. (1982). Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity with Estimates of the Vari­ance of United Kingdom Inflation, Econometrica, 50, pp. 987-1007

Goldman, E. (2020). Lecturer notes: Data Analysis in Finance. Pace University

Hull, J.C. (2015). Risk Management and Financial Institutions. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Ivanova, V., & Gutiérrez, J., M., P., (2014). Interest rate forecasts, state price densities and risk premium from Euribor options, Journal of Banking & Finance, https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jbankfin.2014.03.028

Kongsilp, W., & Mateus, C. (2017). Volatility risk and stock return predictability on global fi­nancial crises. China Finance Review International, 7(1), 33-66.

Mixon, S. (2011). What does implied volatility skew measure?, The Journal of Derivatives, 18, 9–25.

Montgomery, D., Jennings, C., & Kulachi, M. (2008). Introduction Time Series Analysis and Forecasting. John Wiley & Sons Inc.

Neslihanoglu, S., Sogiakas, V., McColl, J.H., & Lee, D. (2017). Nonlinearities in the CAPM: Evidence from developed and emerging markets. Journal of Forecast, 36, 867-897.

Pelizzon, L., & Sartore, D., (2013). Deciphering the Libor and Euribor Spreads during the sub­prime crisis. North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 20, 565 – 585

Shehzad, T. C., & De Haan, J. (2013). Was and the 2007 crisis really a global banking crisis? North American Journal of Economics Finance, 24, 113–124.

Tsung-Han, K., & Yu-Pin, H. (2013). Forecasting volatility with many predictors. Journal of Forecasting, 32, 743-754

Veyrune, R., (2017). Negative euro area interest rates and an effective de-euroization strategy. IFM working paper

Data (official open data): https://www.suomenpankki.fi/en/Statistics/interest-rates/charts/korot_ kuviot/euriborkorot_pv_chrt_en/