fbpx

Brunildaย Kosta – Faculty of Economy, University of Tirana, Arben Broci Street, 1001, Tirana, Albania

Keywords:ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  Innovation;
Firm performance;
COVID-19

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31410/ERAZ.2023.171

Abstract: The purpose of this paper is to investigate the impact of product inยญnovation, process innovation and delivery innovation on firm performance, in response to unexpected crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic. For this purpose, the author conducted a survey with 115 Albanian companies. By employing the regression analysis, the study uncovered that product innovation has a posiยญtive significant impact on firm performance in the aftermath of COVID-19. The study also uncovers a positive yet non-significant relationship between process innovation and firm performance. Contrary to expectations, the research idenยญtifies a counterintuitive outcome in the context of delivery innovation, indicatยญing a negative and statistically significant impact on firm performance. This reยญsearch contributes to our understanding of the complex interplay between inยญnovation and firm performance, offering valuable insights for businesses naviยญgating the challenges of the post-pandemic landscape. The findings prompt a reevaluation of strategic approaches to innovation and underscore the need for nuanced and context-specific strategies to optimize firm outcomes.

9th International Scientific ERAZ Conference โ€“ ERAZ 2023 โ€“ Conference Proceedings: KNOWLEDGE BASED SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, hybrid โ€“ online, virtually and in person, Prague, Czech Republic, June 1, 2023

ERAZ Conference Proceedings published by: Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans – Belgrade, Serbia

ERAZ conference partners: Faculty of Logistics, University of Maribor, Maribor (Slovenia); University of National and World Economy โ€“ UNWE, Sofia (Bulgaria); Center for Political Research and Documentation (KEPET), Research Laboratory of the Department of Political Science of University of Crete (Greece); Institute of Public Finance โ€“ Zagreb (Croatia); Faculty of Tourism and Hospitality Ohrid, University of St. Kliment Ohridski from Bitola (North Macedonia)

ERAZ Conference 2023 Conference Proceedings: ISBN 978-86-80194-72-1, ISSN 2683-5568, DOI: https://doi.org/10.31410/ERAZ.2023

Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission.ย 

Suggested citation

Kosta, B. (2023). How Innovation Drives Firm Performance in the Post COVID-19 Pandemic?. In V. Bevanda (Ed.), ERAZ Conference – Knowlegde Based Sustainable Development: Vol 9. Conference Proceedings (pp. 171-180). Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans. https://doi.org/10.31410/ERAZ.2023.171

References

Abushaikha, I., Salhieh, L., & Towers, N. (2018). Improving distribution and business performance through lean warehousing. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 46(8), 780-800.

Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological bulletin, 103(3), 411.

Ar, I. M. (2012). The impact of green product innovation on firm performance and competitive capaยญbility: the moderating role of managerial environmental concern. Procedia-Social and Behavยญioral Sciences, 62, 854-864.

Atalay, M., Anafarta, N., & Sarvan, F. (2013). The relationship between innovation and firm perforยญmance: An empirical evidence from Turkish automotive supplier industry. Procedia-social and behavioral sciences, 75, 226-235.

Chen, J. S., Tsou, H. T., & Huang, A. Y. H. (2009). Service delivery innovation: Antecedents and imยญpact on firm performance. Journal of Service Research, 12(1), 36-55.

Christa, U., & Kristinae, V. (2021). The effect of product innovation on business performance during COVID 19 pandemic. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 9(1), 151-158.

Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 555-590.

Damanpour, F. (1996). Organizational complexity and innovation: developing and testing multiple contingency models. Management Science, 42(5), 693-716.

Fagerberg, J. (2006). Innovation: A guide to the literature.

Fishenden, J., & Thompson, M. (2013). Digital government, open architecture, and innovation: why public sector IT will never be the same again. Journal of public administration research and theory, 23(4), 977-1004.

Gunday, G., Ulusoy, G., Kilic, K., & Alpkan, L. (2011). Effects of innovation types on firm perforยญmance. International Journal of Production Economics, 133(2), 662-676.

Hage, J., & Meeus, M. T. (Eds.). (2006). Innovation, science, and institutional change: a research handbook. Oxford University Press, USA.

Jin, X., Zhang, M., Sun, G., & Cui, L. (2022). The impact of COVID-19 on firm innovation: Evidence from Chinese listed companies. Finance Research Letters, 45, 102133.

Khalil, M. L., Aziz, N. A., Long, F., & Zhang, H. (2023). What factors affect firm performance in the hotel industry post-COVID-19 pandemic? Examining the impacts of big data analytics capaยญbility, organizational agility and innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 9(2), 100081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100081ย 

Kline, S. J., & Rosenberg, N. (2010). An overview of innovation. Studies on science and the innovaยญtion process: Selected works of Nathan Rosenberg, 173-203.

Le, T. T., & Ikram, M. (2022). Do sustainability innovation and firm competitiveness help improve firm performance? Evidence from the SME sector in Vietnam. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 29, 588-599.

Lee, R., Lee, J. H., & Garrett, T. C. (2019). Synergy effects of innovation on firm performance. Jourยญnal of Business Research, 99, 507-515.

Lerner, J. (2012). The architecture of innovation: The economics of creative organizations. Harvard Business Press.

Lessig, L. (2002). The architecture of innovation. Duke Law Journal, 51(6), 1783-1801.

Li, B., Mousa, S., Reinoso, J. R. R., Alzoubi, H. M., Ali, A., & Hoang, A. D. (2023). The role of technology innovation, customer retention and business continuity on firm performance after post-pandemic era in Chinaโ€™s SMEs. Economic Analysis and Policy, 78, 1209-1220.

Lim, K. Y., & Morris, D. (2023). Business optimism and the innovation-profitability nexus: Introducยญing the COVID-19 adaptable capacity framework. Research Policy, 52(1), 104623.

Mancuso, I., Petruzzelli, A. M., & Panniello, U. (2023). Innovating agri-food business models after the COVID-19 pandemic: The impact of digital technologies on the value creation and value capture mechanisms. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 190, 122404.

Mattera, M., Alba Ruiz-Morales, C., Gava, L., & Soto, F. (2022). Sustainable business models to creยญate sustainable competitive advantages: strategic approach to overcoming COVID-19 crisis and improve financial performance. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal, 32(3), 455-474.

Prifti, R., & Alimehmeti, G. (2017). Market orientation, innovation, and firm performanceโ€”an analยญysis of Albanian firms. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 6(1), 1-19.

Rammer, C. (2023). Measuring process innovation output in firms: Cost reduction versus quality imยญprovement. Technovation, 124, 102753.

Ryu, H. S., & Lee, J. N. (2016). Innovation patterns and their effects on firm performance. The serยญvice industries journal, 36(3-4), 81-101.

Sahi, G. K., Modi, P., & Mantok, S. (2023). New product innovations in times of crisis: How did womยญen entrepreneurs survive the COVID-19 crisis?. Industrial Marketing Management, 111, 19-29.

Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (1996). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling. Mahwah, NJ: L. L. Erlbaum Associates.

Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest and the Business Cycle, translated from the German by Redvers Opie, New Brunswick (U.S.A) and London (U.K.): Transaction Publishers.

Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. Vol. 36, Harper & Row, New York, 132-145.

Seetharaman, P. (2020). Business models shifts: Impact of COVID-19. International Journal of Inforยญmation Management, 54, 102173.

Sharma, A., Shin, H., Santa-Marรญa, M. J., & Nicolau, J. L. (2021). Hotels’ COVID-19 innovation and performance. Annals of Tourism Research, 88, 103180.

Sharma, G. D., Kraus, S., Srivastava, M., Chopra, R., & Kallmuenzer, A. (2022). The changing role of innovation for crisis management in times of COVID-19: An integrative literature review. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 100281.

Siagian, H., Tarigan, Z. J. H., & Jie, F. (2021). Supply chain integration enables resilience, flexibility, and innovation to improve business performance in COVID-19 era. Sustainability, 13(9), 4669.

Tuan, N., Nhan, N., Giang, P., & Ngoc, N. (2016). The effects of innovation on firm performance of supporting industries in Hanoi, Vietnam. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 9(2), 413-431.

Zaefarian, G., Forkmann, S., Mitrฤ™ga, M., & Henneberg, S. C. (2017). A capability perspective on relationship ending and its impact on product innovation success and firm performance. Long range planning, 50(2), 184-199.

Zainal, M. (2022). Innovation orientation and performance of Kuwaiti family businesses: evidence from the initial period of COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Family Business Management, 12(2), 251-265.

Zaltman, G., Duncan, R., & Holbek, J. (1973). Innovations and organizations.

Zhang, D., & Zheng, W. (2022). Does COVID-19 make the firmsโ€™ performance worse? Evidence from the Chinese listed companies. Economic Analysis and Policy, 74, 560-570.

Zia, N. U., Shamim, S., Zeng, J., Awan, U., Chromjakova, F., Akhtar, P., & Orel, M. (2023). Avoiding crisis-driven business failure through digital dynamic capabilities. B2B distribution firms durยญing the COVID-19 and beyond. Industrial Marketing Management, 113, 14-29.