fbpx

Manuela Panaitescu – Danubius University of Galati, Faculty of Economic Sciences, 3 Galati Blvd., Galati, Romania

Keywords:ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  Management;
Decision making;
Participative behavior

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31410/ERAZ.2023.181

Abstract: The main European policy for rural areas is the Common Agriculturยญal Policy (CAP). Regarding the involvement of local communities, CAP, through the LEADER program, contributes to the promotion of a community-led local development strategy, supporting development projects initiated at the local level by Local Action Groups. For good functioning and achieving high efficienยญcy, LAGs resort to the implementation of participative management in the orยญganization. In the presented work, we propose to analyze the importance of participative management within an organization of this type – LAG โ€œEremia Grigorescu 1863โ€ Galati and the contribution to the establishment of new busiยญnesses, the promotion of tourism, the creation of jobs, which lead to the sustainยญable development of rural economy in the South-East Region of Romania. The involvement of the LAG staff in the decision-making process led to the enrichยญment of the level of culture and professional training of the employees, facilitatยญing the achievement of remarkable results in terms of the association. We used the Multi-criteria Analysis to check the way of making decisions within the Loยญcal Action Group.

9th International Scientific ERAZ Conference โ€“ ERAZ 2023 โ€“ Conference Proceedings: KNOWLEDGE BASED SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, hybrid โ€“ online, virtually and in person, Prague, Czech Republic, June 1, 2023

ERAZ Conference Proceedings published by: Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans – Belgrade, Serbia

ERAZ conference partners: Faculty of Logistics, University of Maribor, Maribor (Slovenia); University of National and World Economy โ€“ UNWE, Sofia (Bulgaria); Center for Political Research and Documentation (KEPET), Research Laboratory of the Department of Political Science of University of Crete (Greece); Institute of Public Finance โ€“ Zagreb (Croatia); Faculty of Tourism and Hospitality Ohrid, University of St. Kliment Ohridski from Bitola (North Macedonia)

ERAZ Conference 2023 Conference Proceedings: ISBN 978-86-80194-72-1, ISSN 2683-5568, DOI: https://doi.org/10.31410/ERAZ.2023

Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission.ย 

Suggested citation

Panaitescu, M. (2023). Participative Management in the Framework of a Local Action Group. In V. Bevanda (Ed.), ERAZ Conference – Knowlegde Based Sustainable Development: Vol 9. Conference Proceedings (pp. 181-188). Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans. https://doi.org/10.31410/ERAZ.2023.181

References

Albert, M., & Hahnel, R. (1991). The Political Economy of Participative Economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Andresescu, L., & Panaitescu, M. (2023, In Press). Participative Management, Paper presented at 18th International Conference on European Integration – Realities and Perspectives, Danuยญbius University of Galati, Galati, May 19 – 20, 2023, https://conferences.univ-danubius.ro/inยญdex.php/EIRP/EIRP2023/paper/view/3116ย 

Bezede, R. (2017). Participative management โ€“ key resource for sustainable organizational develยญopment. Pro Didactica, 1 (101), 10-14, http://www.prodidactica.md/revista/Revista_101.pdfย 

Edelenbos, J., & Klijn, E. H. (2006). Managing stakeholder involvement in decision-making: a comparative analysis of six interactive processes in The Netherlands. Journal of Public Adยญministration Research and Theory, 16(3), 417-446, https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui049ย 

Guth, M., Stฤ™pieล„, S., Smฤ™dzik-Ambroลผy, K., & Matuszczak, A. (2022). Is small beautiful? Techยญnical efficiency and environmental sustainability of small-scale family farms under the conditions of agricultural policy support. Journal of Rural Studies, 89, 235-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.11.026ย ย 

Menconi, M. E., Artemi, S., Borghi, P., & Grohmann, D. (2018). Role of Local Action Groups in Improving the Sense of Belonging of Local Communities with Their Territories. Sustainaยญbility, 10, 4681, 1-19, https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124681ย 

Pandeya, G. P. (2015). Does Citizen Participation in Local Government Decision-Making Contribยญute to Strengthening Local Planning and Accountability Systems? An Empirical Assessment of Stakeholders’ Perceptions in Nepal. International Public Management Review, 16 (1), 67โ€“ 98, https://ipmr.net/index.php/ipmr/article/view/247ย 

Pisani, E., Christoforou, A., Burlando, C., Da Re, R., & Franceschetti, G. (2017). Practicing Soยญcial Capital in Local Development: How the Method Applies to Real-World Cases, In Social Capital and Local Development, Palgrave Macmillan Cham, 229โ€“254. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-54277-5ย ย 

Pollermann, K., & Fynn, L. L. (2021). Place-based and participative approaches: reflections for policy design in rural development, Regional Science Association International, Angra do Heroรญsmo, Azores, Portugal, pp. 946-949. https://www.regionalscience.org/images/PDF/

Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York: McGraw Hill. International, Pittsburgh: RWS Publications.

Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytical hierarchy process. Int. J. Services Sciences, 1, (1), 83-98.

Schmied, D. (2022). Winning and Losing: The Changing Geography of Europe’s Rural Areas. Routledge.

Serrano, J. J. & Esparcia, J., (2023). Diagnosis of Rural Development Processes Based on the Stock of Social Capital and Social Networks: Approach from E-I Index. Land, 12, 850, 1-28. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12040850ย 

Zhaodi, Y. (2022). The Role of Stakeholders in Corporate Governance: The Reverse Path of Stakeholdersโ€™ Participation in Corporate Governance, Journal of Social Science and Huยญmanities, 4, (11) 124-128. https://doi.org/10.53469/jssh.2022.4(11).27ย 

Additional reading

https://agriculture.ec.europa.eu/common-agricultural-policy_enย 

https://www.galeg1863.ro/ย 

https://www.madr.ro/axa-leader.htmlย 

https://www.madr.ro/planul-national-strategic-pac-post-2020.htmlย 

Regulation (EU). 2021/2116 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 2 December 2021 on the financing, management and monitoring of the common agricultural policy and reยญpealing Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXยญT/?uri=uriserv:OJ.L_.2021.435.01.0187.01.ENGย