Demoethics and the Sustainable Development Paradigm

Rinat A. Zhanbayev – National Engineering Academy of the Republic of Kazakhstan, 050010, Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan

Muhammad Irfan – School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China; Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China; Department
of Business Administration, Ilma University, Karachi 75190, Pakistan

Zeeshan Fareed – School of Economics and Management, Huzhou University, Huzhou 313000, Zhejiang, China; Centre for Transdisciplinary Development Studies (CETRAD), University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro
(UTAD), Vila Real, Portugal

Anna V. Shutaleva – Department of Philosophy, Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B. N. Yeltsin, 620002 Ekaterinburg, Russia; Department of Social and Humanitarian Disciplines, Ural State Law University
named after V. F. Yakovlev, 620137 Ekaterinburg, Russia

Daniil G. Maksimov – Department of Public Service and Personnel Management Udmurt State University, 426034, Izhevsk, Russia

Abstract: This article explores the challenges faced by humanity in the age of globalization, specifically in the context of anthropological catastrophes. The authors argue that the rapid pace of technological advancement has created an imbalance between technical progress and cultural transformation, leading to a crisis of identity and morality. The article examines the root causes of this imbalance. In response to these challenges, the article proposes a new approach to creating good people and good societies through the cultivation of virtue and knowledge. Drawing on insights from anthropology, sociology, and philosophy, the authors argue that demoethics is the key to achieving sustainable development and social justice. The article provides a detailed analysis of the concept of demoethics, including its historical roots. This article offers a thought-provoking analysis of the complex challenges facing humanity in the 21st century and provides a compelling argument for the importance of cultural transformation and ethical values in achieving a more just and sustainable world.

9th International Scientific ERAZ Conference – ERAZ 2023 – Selected Papers: KNOWLEDGE BASED SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, hybrid – online, virtually and in person, Prague, Czech Republic, June 1, 2023

ERAZ Selected Papers published by: Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans – Belgrade, Serbia

ERAZ conference partners: Faculty of Logistics, University of Maribor, Maribor (Slovenia); University of National and World Economy – UNWE, Sofia (Bulgaria); Center for Political Research and Documentation (KEPET), Research Laboratory of the Department of Political Science of University of Crete (Greece); Institute of Public Finance – Zagreb (Croatia); Faculty of Tourism and Hospitality Ohrid, University of St. Kliment Ohridski from Bitola (North Macedonia)

ERAZ Conference 2023 Selected Papers: ISBN 978-86-80194-73-8, ISSN 2683-5568, DOI: https://doi.org/10.31410/ERAZ.S.P.2023

Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission. 

Suggested citation

Zhanbayev, R. A., Irfan, M., Fareed, Z., Shutaleva, A. V., & Maksimov, D. G. (2023). Demoethics and the Sustainable Development Paradigm. In V. Bevanda (Ed.), ERAZ Conference – Knowlegde Based Sustainable Development: Vol 9. Selected Papers (pp. 197-204). Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans. https://doi.org/10.31410/ERAZ.S.P.2023.197

References

Aimautov, J. (1918). Turala Journal. “Abay” magazines, 1.

Al-Farabi, A. N. (1973). Socio-ethical treatises. Science: Alma-Ata, Kazakhstan.

Al-Farabi, A. N. (1985). On the Perfect State. Clarendon Press.

Al-Farabi, A. N. (2001). The Political Writings. Selected Aphorisms and Other Texts. Cornell University Press. Ithaca.

Apel, K.-O. (1990). Diskurs und Verantwortung. Suhrkamp.

Bakeeva, E. V., & Biricheva, E. V. (2021). “I” and collective responsibility. Vestnik of Saint Pe­tersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 37(1), 41-52. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2021.104 

Barinova, N. V., & Barinov, V. R. (2022). Digital Economy, Artificial Intellect, Industry 5.0: Today’s Challenges. Vestnik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics (5), 23-34. https://doi.org/10.21686/2413-2829-2022-5-23-34 

Gilyazova, O. S., & Zamoshchanskii, I. I. (2020). On motivational tools of gamification in higher education: theoretical aspect. Perspectives of Science and Education, 45(3), 39-51. https://doi.org/10.32744/pse.2020.3.3 

Habermas, J. (1987). The Theory of Communicative Action. Vol. II: Lifeworld and System (T. McCarthy, Trans.). Beacon.

Hametner, M. (2022). Economics without ecology: How the SDGs fail to align socioeconomic development with environmental sustainability. Ecological Economics, 199, 107490.

Hösle, V. (1995). Praktische Philosophie in der modernen Welt. C. H. Beck.

Kirillova, N. B. (2021). New concepts of media science in the sociocultural system of the in­formation civilization. Perspectives of Science and Education, 54(6), 10-22. https://doi.org/10.32744/pse.2021.6.1 

Kirillova, N. B., & Shlykova, O. V. (2022). Modifying the humanities: global challenges of the digital revolution. Perspectives of Science and Education, 59(5), 10-23. https://doi.org/10.32744/pse.2022.5.1  

Lee, M. C. M., Scheepers, H., Lui, A. K. H., & Ngai, E. W. T. (2023). The implementation of ar­tificial intelligence in organizations: A systematic literature review. Information & Man­agement, 60(5), 103816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2023.103816 

Loginov, A. V., & Rudenkin, D. V. (2020). Neither conflict, no concord: Performing ideology in contemporary Russia. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta, Filosofiia i Konflik­tologiia, 36(2), 341-355. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2020.211 

Magistretti, S., Dell’Era, C., & Messeni Petruzzelli, A. (2019). How intelligent is Watson? Ena­bling digital transformation through artificial intelligence. Business Horizons, 62(6), 819- 829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2019.08.004 

Malikov, G. R. (2011). Continuity of ideas about virtues in ancient philosophical thought and Turkic medieval utopian humanism. New Technologies, 3, 195–198.

Maslow, A. H. (1968). Toward a Psychology of Being. Litton Education Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1037/10793-000  

Shutaleva, A. V., Golysheva, M. V., Tsiplakova, Y. V., & Dudchik, A. Y. (2020). Media educa­tion and the formation of the legal culture of society. Perspectives of Science and Educa­tion, 45(3), 10-22. https://doi.org/10.32744/pse.2020.3.1 

Tomiltseva, D. A., & Zheleznov, A. S. (2020). Inevitable Third: Ethical and Politi­cal Aspects of Interactions with Artificial Agents. The Journal of Political Theo­ry, Political Philosophy and Sociology of Politics Politeia, 4(99), 90-107. https://doi.org/10.30570/2078-5089-2020-99-4-90-107 

Tomyuk, O. N., Diachkova, A. V., Dudchik, A. Y., & Kerimov, A. A. (2022). The educational po­tential of media content in the context of the formation of the individual legal culture. Per­spectives of Science and Education, 60(6), 583-597. https://doi.org/10.32744/pse.2022.6.35 

UNESCO. (2014). Shaping the Future We Want: UN Decade of Education for Sustainable De­velopment; Final Report. UNESCO. ISBN 978-92-3-100053-9.

Wang, X. X., Zhang, Q. N., Qian, G. X., & Wang, H. W. (2023). Evaluation on the effective­ness of eco-product value realization. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 37, 9–15.

Zhanbayev, R., & Irfan, M. (2022). Industrial-Innovative Paradigm of Social Sustainability: Modeling the Assessment of Demoethical, Demographic, Democratic, and Demoeconom­ic Factors. Sustainability, 14(12), 7280. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127280 

Zhanbayev, R. A., Yerkin, A. Y., Shutaleva, A. V., Irfan, M., Gabelashvili, K., Temirbaeva, G. R., Chazova, I. Y., & Abdykadyrkyzy, R. (2023). State asset management paradigm in the qua­si-public sector and environmental sustainability: Insights from the Republic of Kazakh­stan. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.1037023