Ana Horvat Vuković – Faculty of Law, University of Zagreb, Trg Republike Hrvatske 3, Zagreb, Croatia
Valentino Kuzelj – Faculty of Law, University of Zagreb, Trg Republike Hrvatske 14, Zagreb, Croatia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31410/ERAZ.2020.59
6th International Conference – ERAZ 2020 – KNOWLEDGE BASED SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, Online/virtual, May 21, 2020, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS
Published by: Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans – Belgrade, Serbia
Conference partners: Faculty of Economics and Business, Mediterranean University, Montenegro; University of National and World Economy – Sofia, Bulgaria; Faculty of Commercial and Business Studies – Celje, Slovenia; Faculty of Applied Management, Economics and Finance – Belgrade, Serbia
ISSN 2683-5568, ISBN 978-86-80194-33-2, DOI: https://doi.org/10.31410/ERAZ.2020
Abstract
The Croatian constitution-maker’s dedication to the concept of a social state begets the state’s
duty to care for public health. This duty is especially salient amid the SARS-CoV-2 virus pandemic. One
would be well-advised to be watchful of the dangers that periods of crisis pose for the viability of liberal democracies: in Croatia, protective measures against the COVID-19 disease have been entrusted
to the national Civil Protection Command in an initially illegal way. This was later on retroactively
convalidated by legislative “patchwork” solutions. It is to be expected that the issue of such measures’
constitutionality will in the foreseeable future present itself on the Constitutional Court’s docket. This
paper focuses on one of the most contentious measures – that of a ban on Sunday trade, particularly its
implications for the economic constitutional rights such as the right of ownership and entrepreneurial
freedom. Furthermore, the authors’ analysis of several Constitutional Court’s decisions from the time
of the previous economic crisis will endeavor to anticipate the Court’s decisions in upcoming cases.
Key words
COVID-19, Crisis measures, State of emergency, Right of ownership, Croatian Constitutional Court.
References
Abramović, A. (2020). Ustavnost u doba virusa. Ius-Info, 30 March 2020.
Bačić, A. (2013). O konstitucionalizaciji socijalnih prava i njihovu slabljenju prema sadržaju. Rad
Hrvatske akademije znanosti i umjetnosti. Razred za društvene znanosti, (No. 516, vol. 50),
187-207.
Brockell, G., (2019). ‘A republic, if you can keep it’: Did Ben Franklin really say Impeachment
Day’s favorite quote?, The Washington Post, Dec. 19, 2019, https://www.washingtonpost.
com/history/2019/12/18/republic-if-you-can-keep-it-did-ben-franklin-really-say-impeachment-days-favorite-quote/ [Accessed: May 9, 2020].
Cindori, S. & Kuzelj, V. (2018). Socijalni aspekt kriznoga poreza: Fiskalni instrument ili devijacija
poreznog sustava?. Ekonomska misao i praksa, 27(2), 479-502.
Constitution of the Republic of Croatia (Official Gazette no. 85/2010 – consolidated text, Official
Gazette no. 5/2014 – Decision of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Croatia anent the
popular referendum initiative on the definition of marriage from 1 December 2013 (amending
Art. 62 of the Constitution)).
Constitutional Court of the Republic of Croatia (1992). Decision no. U-I-179/1991 from 24 June
1992.
Constitutional Court of the Republic of Croatia (2009). Decision and Ruling no. U-IP-3820/2009 et
al. from 17 November 2009.
Constitutional Court of the Republic of Croatia (2015a). Decision no. U-I-1625/2014 et al. from 30
March 2015.
Constitutional Court of the Republic of Croatia (2015b). Decision no. U-I-4405/2013, U-II-3222/2014
from 31 March 2015
Gardašević, Đ. (2003). Odnos prava i politike u realizaciji ljudskih prava. In: N. B. Vučinić, V. Spajić-Vrkaš & S. Bjeković, (Eds.), Ljudska prava za nepravnike (pp. 87-98). Podgorica: Centar
za ljudska prava Univerziteta Crne Gore/Istraživačko obrazovni centar za ljudska prava i
demokratsko građanstvo, Filozofski fakultet Sveučilišta u Zagrebu.
Gardašević, Đ. (2020). In: Sanja Despot, Dosadašnje odluke Stožera RH bile su nelegalne, što
se izmjenom zakona retroaktivno ispravlja, Faktograf, 15 April 2020, at: https://faktograf.
hr/2020/04/15/dosadasnje-odluke-stozera-rh-bile-su-nelegalne-sto-se-izmjenom-zakona-retroaktivno-ispravlja/ [Accessed: 30 June 2020]
Greene, A. (2020). Ştates Should Declare a State of Emergency using Article 15 to confront the
Coronavirus Pandemic. Strasbourg Observers, 1 April 2020.
Kuzelj, V. (2019). Apologija socijalne države nasuprot institucionalizaciji nejednakosti u neoliberalnom poretku. Paragraf, 3(1), 59-84.
Scheinin, M. (2020). To Derogate or Not to Derogate?, COVID-19 Symposium. Opinio Iuris. 6
April 2020.
Smerdel, B. (2019). Kriza demokratskog konstitucionalizma i izgledi demokratske tranzicije u RH.
Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta u Zagrebu, 69(1), 5-35.
Staničić, F. (2020). Zabrana rada u trgovini nedjeljom u Republici Hrvatskoj – ustavnopravni aspekti. Informator, (No. 6625), from 30 April 2020., 1-3.
Tzevelekos, V. (2020). Herd immunity and Lockdown: The Legitimacy of National Policies Against
the Pandemic and Judicial Self-Restraining by the ECtHR. Strasbourg Observers, 11 May
2020.
DOWNLOAD