Teuta Xhindi – European University of Tirana, Bulevardi „Gjergj Fishta”, Nd.70, H.1, Tiranë, Albania
Ermela Kripa – European University of Tirana, Bulevardi „Gjergj Fishta”, Nd.70, H.1, Tiranë, Albania
5th International Conference – ERAZ 2019 – KNOWLEDGE BASED SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, Budapest – Hungary, May 23, 2019, SELECTED PAPERS
Published by: Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans – Belgrade, Serbia
Conference partners: Faculty of Economics and Business, Mediterranean University, Montenegro; University of National and World Economy – Sofia, Bulgaria; Faculty of Commercial and Business Studies – Celje, Slovenia; Faculty of Applied Management, Economics and Finance – Belgrade, Serbia;
ISBN 978-86-80194-21-9, ISSN 2683-5568, DOI: https://doi.org/10.31410/ERAZ.S.P.2019
Risk management is one of the most important processes of all agents operating in the financial
and non-financial markets. It is the combination of three steps: risk assessment, emission and
exposure control and risk monitoring. As of the assessment step, the VaR model is the most common
approach used to measure the market value at risk.
The aim of this paper is to evaluate the performance of the VaR model, in measuring the relative risk in
the Albanian foreign exchange market, where future prices in foreign exchange market are calculated
using the Monte Carlo simulation. In our analysis, we have considered the coefficient of variation a
good tool in measuring relative risk. The utilized data is taken from the official website of the Bank
of Albania, corresponding to the daily rates of exchange in the Albanian foreign exchange market of
January 3, 2018 to January 3, 2019. The instrument used is the simple linear regression, where the dependent
variable is VaR and the independent variable is the coefficient of variation.
The result of the study is: The VaR Model isn’t a good instrument to measure the exchange rate risk in
Value at Risk, Coefficient of Variation, Monte Carlo simulation, Simple Linear Regression.
 Markowitz, H. (1952), “Portfolio Selection”, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 7, No. 1. (Mar.,
1952), pp. 77-91, taken in: https://www.math.ust.hk/~maykwok/courses/ma362/07F/markowitz_
 Jorion, P. (2000). “Value at Risk”, 2 editions, McGraw-Hill, New York at al.
 Hull, J.C. (2007). Risk management and ﬁnancial institutions. Upper Saddle River, NJ:
Pearson Prentice Hall.
 Julijana, A. (2013). Managing market risk with VaR (Value at Risk). Management, 18(2):
 Morgan, J. (1996), “Risk Metrics”, Technical document, Morgan Guaranty Trust Company
 Pallota, M. & Zenti, R. (2000), “Risk analysis for asset managers: Historical simulation, the
bootstrap approach and value at risk calculation”, working paper, RAS Asset Management.
Berkowitz, J., (2002), “How Accurate are Value-at-Risk Models at Commercial Banks?”, The
Journal of Finance, Volume 57 Issue 3, p. 1093–1111.
Brief R.P. & Joel O., (1969), “A note on Earnings Risk and the Coefficient of Variation”, Journal
of Finance, Volume 24, issue 5, fq. 901-904, American Finance Association.
Cassidy, C. & Gizycki, M. (1997). “Measuring traded market risk: value-at-risk and backtesting
techniques”. Research Discussion Paper 9708, Bank Supervision Department Reserve
Bank of Australia.
Dewitt R. & Charles dhe Edna N.R., (1970), “Exact Determination of Earnings Risk by the
Coefficient of Variation”, Journal of Finance, volume 25, issue 5, fq.1161-1165, American
Gitman L.J., (1990), “Fundamentals of Investing“, Boston: Pearson Education.
Gitman L.J., (2007), “Principles of managerial finance“, Boston: Pearson Education.
Jorion, P. (2000). “Value at Risk”, two editions, McGraw-Hill, New York at al.
Jorion, P. (2006). Value at risk: The new benchmark for managing financial risk. New York:
Perez, P., G., & Murphy, D. (2015), “Filtered historical simulation Value-at-Risk models and
their competitors”, Working Paper No. 525, Bank of England.
Sironi, A., (2006), “Rischio e Valore nelle Banche: Risk Management e Capital Allocation,
Egea”, Prima Ristampa, p.103-109.