fbpx

Andrea Bohรกฤikovรก –ย Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Tr. A. Hlinku 2, 94976 Nitra, Slovakia

Tatiana Bencovรก –ย Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Tr. A. Hlinku 2, 94976 Nitra, Slovakia

Zuzana Kapustovรก –ย Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Tr. A. Hlinku 2, 94976 Nitra, Slovakia

ย DOI:ย https://doi.org/10.31410/ERAZ.S.P.2020.33

6th International Conference – ERAZ 2020 – KNOWLEDGE BASED SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT,ย  Online/virtual, May 21, 2020, SELECTED PAPERS

Published by:ย Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans – Belgrade, Serbia
Conference partners: Faculty of Economics and Business, Mediterranean University, Montenegro; University of National and World Economy – Sofia, Bulgaria; Faculty of Commercial and Business Studies – Celje, Slovenia; Faculty of Applied Management, Economics and Finance โ€“ Belgrade, Serbia

ISBN 978-86-80194-34-9, ISSN 2683-5568, DOI: https://doi.org/10.31410/ERAZ.S.P.2020

Abstract

Managing income risk in agriculture is one of the important issues for farmers and policy
makers nowadays. There exist a set of instruments and mechanisms for farmers to face the income
volatility, including the individual or public support. Under II Pillar, the Common Agricultural Policy
(CAP) offers the support for less favoured farms in the way of insurance, mutual fund, and Income
stabilisation tool. The Income Stabilisation Tool (IST) represents the compensation to farmers for a
โ€œsevere dropโ€ in income, if the farm experienced an income loss of more than 30% compared to the
3-years average or the Olympic average of the preceding five-year income realizations. However, none
of the EU countries has been currently using the tool operationally. The main objective of the paper is
to investigate the potential effect of the Income Stabilisation Tool on mitigation of income risk in Slovak
agriculture. The results of the paper show the existing possibility to improve financial situation and
reduce the income inequality of particular Slovak farms in the future.

Key words

Income risk, income stabilisation, CAP, Slovak agriculture.

References

Agri, D. G. (2017). Risk management schemes in EU agriculture; dealing with risk and volatility.
European Commission, Brussels.
Agri, D. G. (2011). Evaluation of effects of direct support on farmersโ€™ income – Common Agricultural
Policy Evaluations, European Commission, Brussels, May, 16 p.
Cordier, J. (2015). Comparative analysis of risk management tools supported by the 2014 US
Farm Bill and the CAP 2014-2020.
El Benni, N., Finger, R., & Meuwissen, M. P. (2016). Potential effects of the income stabilisation
tool (IST) in Swiss agriculture. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 43(3), 475-
502. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbv023
European Commission. (2008). CAP Health Check โ€“ Impact Assessment Note No. 8, Brussels,
DG Agriculture and Rural Development.
European Commission. (2009). Income variability and potential cost of income insurance for
EU, Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development, European Commission,
Brussels, Belgium.
European Commission. (2011). Impact Assessment โ€“ Common Agricultural Policy towards
2020, Commission Staff Working Paper, Annex 6: Risk Management, SEC(2011), 1154,
European Commission, Brussels, Belgium.
European Commission. (2011). Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the
Council on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural
Development (EAFRD). COM(2011), 627/3, European Commission, Brussels, Belgium.

ย European Commission. (2013). Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 of the European Parliament and of
the Council of 17 December 2013 on support for rural development by the EAFRD and repealing
EC No 1698/2005. OJ L (Official Journal European Union L 347/487), 347, 487-548.
Finger, R., & El Benni, N. (2014). A note on the effects of the Income Stabilisation Tool on income
inequality in agriculture. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 65(3), 739-745.
Garrido, A., & Bielza, M. (2008). Evaluating EU risk management instruments: policy lessons
and prospects for the future. W: MPM Meuwissen, MAPM Van Asseldonk, RBM Huirne
(red.), Income stabilisation in European agriculture. Design and economic impact of risk
management tools. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers.
Kimura, S., & Anton, J. (2011). Farm income stabilization and risk management: Some lessons
from AgriStability program in Canada (No. 726-2016-49783), August 30-September 2.
Zurich, Switzerland.
Liesivaara, P., Myyra, S., & Jaakkola, A. (2012). Feasibility of the income stabilisation tool in
Finland (No. 706-2016-48385), February 23rd-24th. Dublin, Ireland.
Mary, S., Santini, F., & Boulanger, P. (2013). An ex-ante assessment of CAP Income Stabilisation
Payments using a farm household model (No. 355-2016-18185).
Meuwissen, et al. (2018). Report on resilience framework for EU agriculture: Sustainable and
resilient EU farming systems (SureFarm) project report, work package D1. 1. Wageningen
University & Research.
Meuwissen, M. P., Assefa, T. T., & van Asseldonk, M. A. (2013). Supporting insurance in European
agriculture: Experience of mutuals in the Netherlands. EuroChoices, 12(3), 10-16.
Meuwissen, M. P., Van Asseldonk, M. A., & Huirne, R. B. (Eds.). (2008). Income stabilisation
in European agriculture: design and economic impact of risk management tools. Wageningen
Academic Publishers.
Pigeon, M., de Frahan, B. H., & Denuit, M. (2014). Evaluation of the EU proposed farm income
stabilisation tool by skew normal linear mixed models. European Actuarial Journal, 4(2),
383-409.
Pigeon, M., Frahan, B. H. D., & Denuit, M. (2012). Actuarial evaluation of the EU proposed
farm income stabilisation tool (No. 706-2016-48370). Paper presented at the 123rd EAAE
Seminar Price Volatility and Farm Income Stabilisation, February 23rd-24th. Dublin, Ireland.
Turvey, C. G. (2012). Whole farm income insurance. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 79(2), 515-
540.
Zgajnar, J. (2017). Analysis of indemnify cation of income risk at sector level: the case of Slovenia.
Studies in Agricultural Economics, 119(2), 70-76.