Aleš Pachmann – AMBIS Vysoká škola, Praha Lindnerova 575/1 180 00 Praha 8 – Libeň, Czech Republic

Keywords:                  Whistleblower;
Courts;
Protection

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31410/ERAZ.2023.535

Abstract: DIRECTIVE (EU) 2019/1937 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 23 October 2019 on the protection of persons who report breaches of the Union was implemented in the Czech Republic by the law no. 171/2023 Coll. effective from 1st August 2023. So far there is a modest related court practice concerning the abovementioned Directive from the Czech Re­public. The aim of this paper is to evaluate and analyse existing court deci­sions in this way. The author of this paper as a whistleblower managed to initi­ate these proceedings as a plaintiff and he is not aware of similar proceedings in this way in the Czech Republic until now. Even delays in proceedings were qualified as retaliatory measures.

9th International Scientific ERAZ Conference – ERAZ 2023 – Conference Proceedings: KNOWLEDGE BASED SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, hybrid – online, virtually and in person, Prague, Czech Republic, June 1, 2023

ERAZ Conference Proceedings published by: Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans – Belgrade, Serbia

ERAZ conference partners: Faculty of Logistics, University of Maribor, Maribor (Slovenia); University of National and World Economy – UNWE, Sofia (Bulgaria); Center for Political Research and Documentation (KEPET), Research Laboratory of the Department of Political Science of University of Crete (Greece); Institute of Public Finance – Zagreb (Croatia); Faculty of Tourism and Hospitality Ohrid, University of St. Kliment Ohridski from Bitola (North Macedonia)

ERAZ Conference 2023 Conference Proceedings: ISBN 978-86-80194-72-1, ISSN 2683-5568, DOI: https://doi.org/10.31410/ERAZ.2023

Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission. 

Suggested citation

Pachmann, A. (2023). Role of Courts in Whistleblowers Protection in the Czech Republic. In V. Bevanda (Ed.), ERAZ Conference – Knowlegde Based Sustainable Development: Vol 9. Conference Proceedings (pp. 535-541). Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans. https://doi.org/10.31410/ERAZ.2023.535

References

Abazi, V. (2020). The European Union Whistleblower Directive: A ‘Game Changer’ for Whis­tleblowing Protection? Industrial Law Journal, 49(4), 640-656. https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dwaa023 

Butler, J. V., Serra, D., & Spagnolo, G. (2020). Motivating Whistleblowers. Management Sci­ence, 66(2), 605-621. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2018.3240 

De Zwart, A. P. (2020). EU whistleblowing rules to change in favor of whistleblowers. Journal of Investment Compliance, 21(1), 55-61. https://doi.org/10.1108/joic-08-2020-0015 

Directive (EU) 2019/1937 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2019 on the Protection of Persons Who Report Breaches of Union Law.

RESOLUTION of the Municipal Court in Prague No. 10 Ad 10/2020 – 102 from 25.11.2021. https://www.zakonyprolidi.cz/judikat/msph/10-ad-10-2020-102 

RESOLUTION of the Constitutional Court No. IV. ÚS 2401/22 from 4. October 2022. http://kraken.slv.cz/IV.US2401/22 

RESOLUTION of the Supreme Administrative Court No. 4 Ads 440/2021 – 105 from 28.6.2022. https://www.zakonyprolidi.cz/judikat/nsscr/4-ads-440-2021-105 

Turksen, U. (2018). The Criminalisation and Protection of Whistleblowers in the EU’s Coun­ter-Financial Crime Framework. In K. Ligeti, & S. Tosza (Eds.), White Collar Crime – A Comparative Perspective (1 ed., pp. 331-366). Hart Publishing..