Annalisa Baldissera – University of Brescia, Department of Law, Via San Faustino 41, Brescia, Italy
Keywords: Non-financial reporting;
Accounting models;
Accounting integrations
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31410/ERAZ.2022.109
Abstract: This study aims to analyze the connections between integrated reporting (IR) and sustainability reporting (SR), in order to verify whether the IR can contribute to improving the SR prepared according to the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) standards. In particular, this study considers the topic from the point of view of the SR to understand the benefits that it could obtain from the information disclosed through the IR. To this end, the study analyzes the integrated reports relating to the 2021 financial year of two listed Italian companies operating in the financial sector. The research has highlighted that some areas of sustainability, especially relating to the economic and environmental dimensions, are actually enhanced by integrated reporting, while the information benefits regarding the social dimension are less evident. The study can help indicate the advantages and possible improvements of the connections between SR and IR.


8th International Scientific ERAZ Conference – ERAZ 2022 – Conference Proceedings: KNOWLEDGE BASED SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, Online-Virtual (Prague, Czech Republic), May 26, 2022
ERAZ Conference Proceedings published by: Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans – Belgrade, Serbia
ERAZ conference partners: Faculty of Economics and Business, Mediterranean University, Montenegro; University of National and World Economy – Sofia, Bulgaria; Faculty of Commercial and Business Studies – Celje, Slovenia; AMBIS University, Prague – Czech Republic; Faculty of Applied Management, Economics and Finance – Belgrade, Serbia
ERAZ Conference 2022 Conference Proceedings: ISBN 978-86-80194-60-8, ISSN 2683-5568, DOI: https://doi.org/10.31410/ERAZ.2022
Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission.
Sugested citation
Baldissera, A. (2022). Improve Sustainability Reporting through Integrated Reporting: Evidence from Italy. In V. Bevanda (Ed.), ERAZ Conference – Knowlegde Based Sustainable Development: Vol 8. Conference Proceedings (pp. 109-116). Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans. https://doi.org/10.31410/ERAZ.2022.109
References
Adams, C. A. (2015). The international integrated reporting council: a call to action. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 27, 23-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2014.07.001
Busco, C., Frigo, M. L., Riccaboni, A., & Quattrone, P. (Eds.) (2013). Integrated Reporting: Concepts and Cases that Redefine Corporate Accountability. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02168-3
Christofi, A., Christofi, P., & Sisaye, S. (2012). Corporate sustainability: historical development and reporting practices. Management Research Review, 35(2), 157-172. https://doi.org/10.1108/01409171211195170
De Villiers, C., & Maroun, W. (2017) (Eds.), Sustainability accounting and integrated reporting, London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315108032
del Mar Alonso‐Almeida, M., Llach, J., & Marimon, F. (2014). A closer look at the ‘Global Reporting Initiative’ sustainability reporting as a tool to implement environmental and social policies: A worldwide sector analysis. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 21(6), 318-335. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1318
Fonseca, A., McAllister, M. L., & Fitzpatrick, P. (2014). Sustainability reporting among mining corporations: a constructive critique of the GRI approach. Journal of cleaner production, 84, 70-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.11.050
Hedberg, C. J., & Von Malmborg, F. (2003). The global reporting initiative and corporate sustainability reporting in Swedish companies. Corporate social responsibility and environmental management, 10(3), 153-164. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.38
Khan, H. U. Z., Islam, M., Fatima, J., & Ahmed, K. (2011). Corporate sustainability reporting of major commercial banks in line with GRI: Bangladesh evidence. Social Responsibility Journal, 7(3), 347-362. https://doi.org/10.1108/17471111111154509
Knebel, S., & Seele, P. (2015). Quo vadis GRI? A (critical) assessment of GRI 3.1 A+ non-financial reports and implications for credibility and standardization. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 20(2), 196-212. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-11-2013-0101
Larrinaga, C., & Bebbington, J. (2020). The pre-history of sustainability reporting: a constructivist reading. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 34(9), 131-150. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-03-2017-2872
Mio, C. (2016). Integrated reporting: The IIRC framework. In Mio, C. (Ed.), Integrated Reporting (pp. 1-18). London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55149-8_1
Moneva, J. M., Archel, P., & Correa, C. (2006). GRI and the camouflaging of corporate unsustainability. Accounting forum, 30(2), 121-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2006.02.001
Morhardt, J. E., Baird, S., & Freeman, K. (2002). Scoring corporate environmental and sustainability reports using GRI 2000, ISO 14031 and other criteria. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 9(4), 215-233. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.26
Nikolaeva, R., & Bicho, M. (2011). The role of institutional and reputational factors in the voluntary adoption of corporate social responsibility reporting standards. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(1), 136-157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-010-0214-5
O‘Dwyer, B., Unerman, J., & Hession, E. (2005). User needs in sustainability reporting: Perspectives of stakeholders in Ireland. European Accounting Review, 14(4), 759-787. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180500104766
World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED) (1987). Our Common Future. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.