Annalisa Baldissera – University of Brescia, Department of Law, Via San Faustino 41, Brescia, Italy

 

 

Keywords:Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β Β  Β  Β  Β  Β Non-financial reporting;
Accounting models;
Accounting integrations

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31410/ERAZ.2022.109

Abstract: This study aims to analyze the connections between integrated reporting (IR) and sustainability reporting (SR), in order to verify whether the IR can contribute to improving the SR prepared according to the Global ReΒ­porting Initiative (GRI) standards. In particular, this study considers the topΒ­ic from the point of view of the SR to understand the benefits that it could obtain from the information disclosed through the IR. To this end, the study analyzes the integrated reports relating to the 2021 financial year of two listed Italian companies operating in the financial sector. The research has highlighted that some areas of sustainability, especially relating to the ecoΒ­nomic and environmental dimensions, are actually enhanced by integrated reporting, while the information benefits regarding the social dimension are less evident. The study can help indicate the advantages and possible imΒ­provements of the connections between SR and IR.

8th International Scientific ERAZ Conference – ERAZ 2022 – Conference Proceedings: KNOWLEDGE BASED SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, Online-Virtual (Prague, Czech Republic), May 26, 2022

ERAZ Conference Proceedings published by: Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans – Belgrade, Serbia

ERAZ conference partners: Faculty of Economics and Business, Mediterranean University, Montenegro; University of National and World Economy – Sofia, Bulgaria; Faculty of Commercial and Business Studies – Celje, Slovenia; AMBIS University, Prague – Czech Republic; Faculty of Applied Management, Economics and Finance – Belgrade, Serbia

ERAZ Conference 2022 Conference Proceedings: ISBN 978-86-80194-60-8, ISSN 2683-5568, DOI: https://doi.org/10.31410/ERAZ.2022

Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission.Β 

Sugested citation

Baldissera, A. (2022). Improve Sustainability Reporting through Integrated Reporting: Evidence from Italy. In V. Bevanda (Ed.), ERAZ Conference – Knowlegde Based Sustainable Development: Vol 8. Conference Proceedings (pp. 109-116). Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans. https://doi.org/10.31410/ERAZ.2022.109

References

Adams, C. A. (2015). The international integrated reporting council: a call to action. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 27, 23-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2014.07.001Β 

Busco, C., Frigo, M. L., Riccaboni, A., & Quattrone, P. (Eds.) (2013). Integrated Reporting: Concepts and Cases that Redefine Corporate Accountability. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02168-3Β 

Christofi, A., Christofi, P., & Sisaye, S. (2012). Corporate sustainability: historical developΒ­ment and reporting practices. Management Research Review, 35(2), 157-172. https://doi.org/10.1108/01409171211195170Β Β 

De Villiers, C., & Maroun, W. (2017) (Eds.), Sustainability accounting and integrated reportΒ­ing, London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315108032Β 

del Mar Alonso‐Almeida, M., Llach, J., & Marimon, F. (2014). A closer look at the β€˜Global ReΒ­porting Initiative’ sustainability reporting as a tool to implement environmental and social policies: A worldwide sector analysis. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 21(6), 318-335. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1318

Fonseca, A., McAllister, M. L., & Fitzpatrick, P. (2014). Sustainability reporting among mining corporations: a constructive critique of the GRI approach. Journal of cleaner production, 84, 70-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.11.050Β 

Hedberg, C. J., & Von Malmborg, F. (2003). The global reporting initiative and corporate susΒ­tainability reporting in Swedish companies. Corporate social responsibility and environΒ­mental management, 10(3), 153-164. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.38Β 

Khan, H. U. Z., Islam, M., Fatima, J., & Ahmed, K. (2011). Corporate sustainability reporting of major commercial banks in line with GRI: Bangladesh evidence. Social Responsibility Journal, 7(3), 347-362. https://doi.org/10.1108/17471111111154509Β 

Knebel, S., & Seele, P. (2015). Quo vadis GRI? A (critical) assessment of GRI 3.1 A+ non-finanΒ­cial reports and implications for credibility and standardization. Corporate CommunicaΒ­tions: An International Journal, 20(2), 196-212. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-11-2013-0101Β 

Larrinaga, C., & Bebbington, J. (2020). The pre-history of sustainability reporting: a construcΒ­tivist reading. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 34(9), 131-150. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-03-2017-2872Β 

Mio, C. (2016). Integrated reporting: The IIRC framework. In Mio, C. (Ed.), Integrated ReportΒ­ing (pp. 1-18). London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55149-8_1Β 

Moneva, J. M., Archel, P., & Correa, C. (2006). GRI and the camouflaging of corporate unsusΒ­tainability. Accounting forum, 30(2), 121-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2006.02.001Β 

Morhardt, J. E., Baird, S., & Freeman, K. (2002). Scoring corporate environmental and sustainΒ­ability reports using GRI 2000, ISO 14031 and other criteria. Corporate Social ResponsiΒ­bility and Environmental Management, 9(4), 215-233. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.26Β 

Nikolaeva, R., & Bicho, M. (2011). The role of institutional and reputational factors in the volunΒ­tary adoption of corporate social responsibility reporting standards. Journal of the AcadeΒ­my of Marketing Science, 39(1), 136-157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-010-0214-5Β 

Oβ€˜Dwyer, B., Unerman, J., & Hession, E. (2005). User needs in sustainability reporting: PerΒ­spectives of stakeholders in Ireland. European Accounting Review, 14(4), 759-787. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180500104766Β Β 

World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED) (1987). Our Common Future. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.