Aleลก Pachmann – AMBIS Vysokรก ลกkola, Praha Lindnerova 575/1 180 00 Praha 8 – Libeล, Czech Republic
Keywords:ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย Whistleblower;
Courts;
Protection
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31410/ERAZ.2023.535
Abstract: DIRECTIVE (EU) 2019/1937 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 23 October 2019 on the protection of persons who report breaches of the Union was implemented in the Czech Republic by the law no. 171/2023 Coll. effective from 1st August 2023. So far there is a modest related court practice concerning the abovementioned Directive from the Czech Reยญpublic. The aim of this paper is to evaluate and analyse existing court deciยญsions in this way. The author of this paper as a whistleblower managed to initiยญate these proceedings as a plaintiff and he is not aware of similar proceedings in this way in the Czech Republic until now. Even delays in proceedings were qualified as retaliatory measures.
9th International Scientific ERAZ Conference โ ERAZ 2023 โ Conference Proceedings: KNOWLEDGE BASED SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, hybrid โ online, virtually and in person, Prague, Czech Republic, June 1, 2023
ERAZ Conference Proceedings published by: Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans – Belgrade, Serbia
ERAZ conference partners: Faculty of Logistics, University of Maribor, Maribor (Slovenia); University of National and World Economy โ UNWE, Sofia (Bulgaria); Center for Political Research and Documentation (KEPET), Research Laboratory of the Department of Political Science of University of Crete (Greece); Institute of Public Finance โ Zagreb (Croatia); Faculty of Tourism and Hospitality Ohrid, University of St. Kliment Ohridski from Bitola (North Macedonia)
ERAZ Conference 2023 Conference Proceedings: ISBN 978-86-80194-72-1, ISSN 2683-5568, DOI: https://doi.org/10.31410/ERAZ.2023
Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission.ย
Suggested citation
Pachmann, A. (2023). Role of Courts in Whistleblowers Protection in the Czech Republic. In V. Bevanda (Ed.), ERAZ Conference – Knowlegde Based Sustainable Development: Vol 9. Conference Proceedings (pp. 535-541). Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans. https://doi.org/10.31410/ERAZ.2023.535
References
Abazi, V. (2020). The European Union Whistleblower Directive: A ‘Game Changer’ for Whisยญtleblowing Protection? Industrial Law Journal, 49(4), 640-656. https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dwaa023ย
Butler, J. V., Serra, D., & Spagnolo, G. (2020). Motivating Whistleblowers. Management Sciยญence, 66(2), 605-621. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2018.3240ย
De Zwart, A. P. (2020). EU whistleblowing rules to change in favor of whistleblowers. Journal of Investment Compliance, 21(1), 55-61. https://doi.org/10.1108/joic-08-2020-0015ย
Directive (EU) 2019/1937 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2019 on the Protection of Persons Who Report Breaches of Union Law.
RESOLUTION of the Municipal Court in Prague No. 10 Ad 10/2020 โ 102 from 25.11.2021. https://www.zakonyprolidi.cz/judikat/msph/10-ad-10-2020-102ย
RESOLUTION of the Constitutional Court No. IV. รS 2401/22 from 4. October 2022. http://kraken.slv.cz/IV.US2401/22ย
RESOLUTION of the Supreme Administrative Court No. 4 Ads 440/2021 โ 105 from 28.6.2022. https://www.zakonyprolidi.cz/judikat/nsscr/4-ads-440-2021-105ย
Turksen, U. (2018). The Criminalisation and Protection of Whistleblowers in the EUโs Counยญter-Financial Crime Framework. In K. Ligeti, & S. Tosza (Eds.), White Collar Crime – A Comparative Perspective (1 ed., pp. 331-366). Hart Publishing..