fbpx

Katerina Fotova ฤŒikoviฤ‡ – University North, Trg dr. ลฝarka Dolinara 1, 48000 Koprivnica, Republic of Croatia

Keywords:ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย  ย ย 

Personality traits;
Internal locus of control;
Entrepreneurship;
Entrepreneurial intention;
Literature review

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31410/ERAZ.S.P.2022.73

Abstract:ย A countryโ€™s economic growth and development are closely linked to entrepreneurship and innovation, which is why entrepreneurs are recognized as one of the key drivers of the economy. Moreover, job creation, employment and innovation of products and services not only affect the naยญtional economy but also the global economy. Having that in mind, it is comยญprehensible why the ability to understand and predict entrepreneurial inยญtention (EI) turned into a central category that is widely researched in the literature.

The main goal of this PRISMA-guided systematic literature review is to idenยญtify, present and qualitatively analyse relevant papers regarding entrepreยญneurial intention, personality traits and especially the internal locus of conยญtrol. Moreover, other goals are to highlight the importance and influence of personality traits and the internal locus of control on entrepreneurial intenยญtions and to present the findings regarding the interrelatedness of entrepreยญneurial intention, internal locus of control and personality traits.

This article uses a systematic review according to the PRISMA statement guidelines with stringent selection criteria to include relevant articles on the impact of personality traits and internal locus of control on entrepreยญneurship (i.e. entrepreneurial intentions). The two largest scientific databasยญes, i.e. Scopus and Clarivate Web of Science databases have been explored with the key phrases โ€žPERSONALITY TRAITSโ€œ, โ€œINTERNAL LOCUS OF CONยญTROLโ€ and โ€œENTREPRENEURIAL INTENTIONโ€. This PRISMA method led to a total of 9 relevant papers regarding the impact and influence of personaliยญty traits and internal locus of control on entrepreneurship (i.e. entrepreneurยญial intentions).

The scientific contribution of this paper is mirrored in the presentation of these relevant articles, their findings and in raising awareness among acaยญdemic members, researchers and governments across the globe regarding the traits that impact entrepreneurial intentions, with a special focus on the findings regarding the internal locus of control. This article provides practiยญcal implications for national governments regarding their entrepreneurial policies, support system and climate.

8th International Scientific ERAZ Conference โ€“ ERAZ 2022 โ€“ Selected Papers: KNOWLEDGE BASED SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, Online-Virtual (Prague, Czech Republic), May 26, 2022

ERAZ Selected Papers published by: Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans – Belgrade, Serbia

ERAZ conference partners: Faculty of Economics and Business, Mediterranean University, Montenegro; University of National and World Economy – Sofia, Bulgaria; Faculty of Commercial and Business Studies – Celje, Slovenia; AMBIS University, Prague – Czech Republic; Faculty of Applied Management, Economics and Finance โ€“ Belgrade, Serbia

ERAZ Conference 2022 Selected Papers: ISBN 978-86-80194-61-5, ISSN 2683-5568, DOI: https://doi.org/10.31410/ERAZ.S.P.2022

Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission.ย 

Sugested citation

Fotova ฤŒikoviฤ‡, K. (2022). The Impact of Personality Traits and Internal Locus of Control on Entrepreneurial Intention. In V. Bevanda (Ed.), ERAZ Conference – Knowlegde Based Sustainable Development: Vol 8. Selected Papers (pp. 73-85). Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans. https://doi.org/10.31410/ERAZ.S.P.2022.73

References

Acs, Z., Virgill, N. (2009). Entrepreneurship in developing countries, Jena Economic Research Papers, No. 2009, 023, Friedrich Schiller University Jena and Max Planck Institute of Ecoยญnomics, Jena.

Ajzen, I. (1988). Attitudes, personality, and behavior. Chicago: DorseyPress.

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), pp.179-211, DOI: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

ร‡olakoฤŸlu, N., Gรถzรผkara, I. (2016). A comparison study on personality traits based on the atยญtitudes of university students toward entrepreneurship, Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 229, pp. 133 โ€“ 140. DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.07.122

Cuervo, ร., Ribeiro, D., Roig, S. (2007). Entrepreneurship: Concepts, Theory and Perspective. Introduction. In: Cuervo, ร., Ribeiro, D., Roig, S. (eds) Entrepreneurship. Springer, Berยญlin, Heidelberg. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-48543-8_1

Denanyoh, R., Adjei, K., Nyemekye, G.E., (2015). Factors That Impact on Entrepreneurial Inยญtention of Tertiary Students in Ghana, International Journal of Business and Social Reยญsearch, 5(3), pp.19-29.

EroฤŸlu, O. & Picak, M. (2011). Entrepreneurship, national culture and Turkey, International Journal of Business and Science 2, pp. 146-151.

Farrukh, M., Alzubi, Y., Shahzad, I.A., Waheed, A. and Kanwal, N. (2018). Entrepreneurial inยญtentions: The role of personality traits in perspective of theory of planned behaviour, Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 12(3), pp. 399-414. DOI: 10.1108/ APJIE-01-2018-0004

Fatoki, O. (2020). Determinants of Sustainability-Oriented Entrepreneurial Intentions of Univerยญsity Students. Southern African Business Review, 24, DOI: 10.25159/1998-8125/7795.32

Fini R., Grimaldi R., Marzocchi G.L., Sobrero M., (2012). The determinants of corporate entreยญpreneurial intention within small and newly established firms, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36, pp. 387-414. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00411.x

Gartner, W. (1989). Who Is an Entrepreneur? Is the Wrong Question. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 13. DOI: 10.1177/104225878801200401

Irengun, O. & Arikboga, S. (2015). The effect of personality traits on social entrepreneurยญship intentions: a field research. Social and Behavioral Sciences 195, pp. 1186-1195. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.172

Jovanov Apasieva, T., Cabuleva, K., Mitreva, M. (2020). Theory of planned behavior: personal attitude and perceived behavioral control as key determinants in creation of entrepreneurยญial societies and social inclusion of young people. Balkan Social Science Review, 15, pp. 275-297. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46763/BSSR20150276ja

Karabulut, A. T. (2016). Personality Traits on Entrepreneurial Intention, Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 22, pp. 12 โ€“ 21. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.07.109

Karimi, S., Biemans, H., Mahdei, K.N., Lans, T., Chizari, M. & Mulder, M. (2015). Testing the Relationship between Personality Characteristics, Contextual Factors and Entrepreneurยญial Intentions in a Developing Country. International Journal of Psychology, 52. DOI: 10.1002/ijop.12209

Kerr, S.P., Kerr, W.R., Xu, T. (2017). Personality Traits of Entrepreneurs: A Review of Recent Literature. Harvard Business School. Working Paper 18-047.

Liberati, A., Altman, D., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gรธtzsche, P, Ioannidis, J., Clarke, M., Deverยญeaux, P.J. Kleijnen, J. & Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Sysยญtematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration. Journal of clinical epidemiology. 62. e1-34. DOI: 10.1016/j. jclinepi.2009.06.006

Lumpkin, J. R. (1985). Validity of a brief locus of control scale for survey research. Psychologยญical Reports, 57(2), pp. 655โ€“659.

Lรผthje, C., & Franke, N. (2003). The โ€˜makingโ€™ of an entrepreneur: Testing a model of entrepreยญneurial intent among engineering students at MIT. R&D Management, 33(2), pp. 135โ€“147. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9310.00288

Mahmood, T.M.A.T., Al Mamun, A. & Ibrahim, M.D. (2020). Attitude towards entrepreneurยญship: a study among Asnaf Millennials in Malaysia. Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship 14(1), pp. 2-14. DOI 10.1108/APJIE-06-2019-0044

Molino, M., Dolce, V., Cortese, CG., Ghislieri, C., (2018). Personality and social support as determinants of entrepreneurial intention. Gender differences in Italy. PLoS ONE 13(6): e0199924. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199924

Munir, H., Jianfeng, C. & Ramzan, S. (2019). Personality traits and theory of planned behavior comparison of entrepreneurial intentions between an emerging economy and a developing country. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 25 (3), pp. 554- 580. DOI: 10.1108/IJEBR-05-2018-0336

Nabi, G., & Linan, F. (2013). Considering business start-up in recession time: The role of risk perception and economic context in shaping the entrepreneurial intent. Internationยญal Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 19(6), pp. 633-655. DOI: 10.1108/IJEBR-10-2012-0107

Ozaralli, N., Rivenburgh, N.K. (2016). Entrepreneurial intention: antecedents to entrepreneuriยญal behavior in the U.S.A. and Turkey. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 6(3), pp. 1-32, DOI: 10.1186/s40497-016-0047-x

Paul, J., Hermel, P., Srivatava, A. (2017). Entrepreneurial intentions โ€“ theory and evidence from Asia, America, and Europe, Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 15(3), pp. 324-351. DOI: 10.1007/s10843-017-0208-1

Presenza, A., Abbate, T., Meleddu, M. & Sheehan, L. (2020). Start-up entrepreneursโ€™ personalยญity traits. An exploratory analysis of the Italian tourism industry, Current Issues in Tourยญism, 23(17), pp. 2146-2164, DOI: 10.1080/13683500.2019.1677572

Pupavac, D. (2015). Extroverted Personality As An Advantage In Entrepreneurship. Obrazovanยญje za poduzetniลกtvo – E4E, 5 (2), pp. 133-143.

Rajh, E., Budak, J., Ateljeviฤ‡, J., Davฤev, Lj., Jovanov, T. & Ognjenoviฤ‡, K. (2017). Entrepreยญneurial intentions in selected South-East European countries. In: Economic development and entrepreneurship in transition economies: is free trade working for transitional and developing economies?: Conference proceedings. Faculty of Economics, Banja Luka, pp. 592-610.

Rauch, A., & Frese, M. (2007). Born to Be an Entrepreneur? Revisiting the Personality Apยญproach to Entrepreneurship. In J. R. Baum, M. Frese, & R. A. Baron (Eds.), The organizaยญtional frontiers. The psychology of entrepreneurship (pp. 41โ€“65). Lawrence Erlbaum Asยญsociates Publishers.

Reynolds, P. D. (2005). Understanding business creation: Serendipity and scope in two decades of business creation studies. Small Business Economics, 24, pp. 359-364.

Saeed, R., Nayyab, H.H., Rashied, H., Lodhi, R.N., Musawar, S. & Iqbal, A. (2013). Who is the most potential entrepreneur? A case of Pakistan. Middle East Journal of Scientific Reยญsearch. 17. pp. 1307-1315. DOI: 10.5829/idosi.mejsr.2013.17.09.12296

Selรงuk A. A. (2019). A Guide for Systematic Reviews: PRISMA. Turkish archives of otorhiยญnolaryngology, 57(1), pp. 57โ€“58. DOI: 10.5152/tao.2019.4058

ล ubiฤ‡, R., Naฤinoviฤ‡ Braje, I. & ลฝagi, K. (2019). Family background and financial literacy as a prerequisite for entrepreneurial intention of university students. In: Proceedings of FEB Zagreb 10th International Odyssey Conference on Economics and Business DOI: 10.22598/odyssey

Thurik, A. R., L. M. Uhlaner and S. Wennekers, (2002). Entrepreneurship and Its Conditions: A Macro Perspective, International Journal of Entrepreneurship Education 1(1), pp. 25โ€“64.

Utsch, A. & Rauch, A. (2000). Innovativeness and initiative as mediators between achievement orientation and venture performance. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psyยญchology, 9(1), pp. 45โ€“62. DOI: 10.1080/135943200398058

Voda, A.I., Florea, N. (2019). Impact of Personality Traits and Entrepreneurship Education on Entrepreneurial Intentions of Business and Engineering Students. Sustainability, 11, 1192; DOI: 10.3390/su11041192

Yฤฑldฤฑrฤฑm, N., ร‡akฤฑr, ร–., Bige AลŸkun, O. (2016). Ready to Dare? A Case Study on the Entrepreยญneurial Intentions of Business and Engineering Students in Turkey, Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 229, pp. 277 โ€“ 288. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.07.138